Categories

History

Making sense of Jackson Diehl

Jackson Diehl, the deputy editorial page editor of the Washington Post, has an op-ed today in which he asserts that the lack of political progress in Iraq is an argument for staying there indefinitely. It’s another version of the now familiar If-Things-Are-Getting-Worse-We-Must-Stay-In-Iraq-And-On-The-Other-Hand-If-Things-Are-Getting-Better-Then-We-Must-Stay-In-Iraq argument that, whatever its deficiencies might be, is at least admirably consistent.

. . . → Read More: Making sense of Jackson Diehl

Will Giuliani’s lone endearing trait alienate Republicans?

Rudy Giuliani is as mendaciously corrupt as a politician can get these days, which is to say, absolutely. With authoritarian tendencies bordering on the fascist, a hyper-inflated ego and a raging sense of entitlement, there’s just not much to like about him as a person or as a politician.

Except this: he knows how . . . → Read More: Will Giuliani’s lone endearing trait alienate Republicans?

A brief comment on the assasination of Benazir Bhutto

Condi did it.

No, U.S. secretary of state Condoleezza Rice didn’t pull the trigger or build the bomb or hire the assassin, but it was the U.S. effort to force Pakistan’s dictator, Pervex Musharraf, into a power-sharing arrangement with Bhutto that led directly to her death.

Steve Clemons, proprietor of the Washington Note and . . . → Read More: A brief comment on the assasination of Benazir Bhutto

Who needs a plot? Three books reviewed

Claudine in School, by Colette
Sandbag Shuffle, by Kevin Marc Fournier
Ward No. 6 and Other Stories, by Anton Chekhov

Two months ago, I hosted a game of Diplomacy. I am sure I wasn’t the ideal moderator in a lot of respects (especially for letting the whole game lapse when players disappeared), but I tried to provide interest and make it fun by contributing tiny period pieces. Not a history scholar myself, this necessitated reading a few period pieces myself, set at the time of the game, in 1900. So I asked around, and Kevin gave me recommendations for both Colette and Chekhov, (my fifth-rate Colette micro-pastiche can be found here, my awful Chekhov impersonation here; and although I read it for the same reason, Winston Churchill didn’t fit the present theme–you can read my review of that one here if you’re interested). As it happened, I finished reading his (Kevin’s) book to my daughter a couple months earlier, and I noticed a lot in common with the authors he’d suggested. In particular, none of them rely overmuch on a plot, or on heavy themes, or on structure, but rather on a careful or playful observation of setting and character.
Continue reading Who needs a plot? Three books reviewed

The overhyped scandal of the CIA torture tapes

Someone may ultimately get convicted of something in connection with the destruction of CIA videos showing the torture of two terrorism suspects, but if so it will be along the lines of lying to Congress or criminal contempt, not anything having to do with torture.

That’s because the Military Commissions Act of 2006 amended . . . → Read More: The overhyped scandal of the CIA torture tapes

O’Hanlon: surge greatest US military comeback since Watts

Michael O’Hanlon, the Brookings Institution wonk who once famously posed as a harsh critic of the adventure in Iraq in order to highlight his devotion to The Surge, has another (but mercifully more brief) op-ed on the subject in the New York Times.

In this one, he says that “the greatest American military . . . → Read More: O’Hanlon: surge greatest US military comeback since Watts

Romney’s role at Battle of Bull Run questioned

So, Mitt Romney never saw his father march with Martin Luther King, something Romney says is simply a matter of how one defines “saw”, “march”, “with”, and “Martin Luther King.” Most people take the words to mean what they seem to mean, while Romney argues that they are figurative, and easily deconstructed. Neither did . . . → Read More: Romney’s role at Battle of Bull Run questioned

Alien v Predator II: Schwarzeneger takes on Cheney

California governor Arnold Schwarzenegger says he’ll sue to overturn a Bush administration ban on tough California greenhouse gas emission standards. The EPA decision, which was made against EPA staff recommendations and appears to have been dictated to EPA chief Stephen Johnson by vice president Dick Cheney, would prevent California from imposing tougher standards than . . . → Read More: Alien v Predator II: Schwarzeneger takes on Cheney

Naddering nabobs, effete intellectual snobs trash Huckabee

Dean Barnett in the Weekly Standard continues the intellectual irreligious right’s jihad against Mike Huckabee today, following in the foosteps of his editor, Rich Lowry, and Ann Coulter at the malappropriately named Human Events.

For my money, Barnett is the clear winner in this kneecapping derby, with an entry aimed at Huckabee’s essay in . . . → Read More: Naddering nabobs, effete intellectual snobs trash Huckabee

Angels drop a buck for Huck, plus: Romney redefines “with”

Someone has to win the GOP presidential primaries, but it’s really tough to imagine who. My ongoing encounter with Ron Paul’s supporters tempts me to think that it might be him but I can’t, really; the numbers just aren’t there. Giuliani is tanking; McCain’s support is still limited to the press—now more enamored than ever following the Lieberman endorsement—and a smattering of aged war criminals; Tancredo is out; Alan Keyes is waaaaaay out; Fred Thompson has abandoned even the pretense of campaigning; and a couple of items we ran across today highlight the ongoing battles between Mike Huckabee and Mitt Romney in their respective corners, and reality in a third.

First to Romney, and his regrettable, if understandable, tendency to regard history as a matter of convenience rather than record. In this instance, it’s a spurious reference to his father, former presidential candidate and Michigan governor George Romney, marching with Martin Luther King.

In the most-watched speech of his political career, speaking on “Faith in America” at College Station, Texas, earlier this month, Mitt Romney evoked the strongest of all symbolic claims to civil-rights credentials: “I saw my father march with Martin Luther King.”

He has repeated the claim several times recently, most prominently to Tim Russert on Meet the Press . But, while the late George W. Romney, a four-term governor of Michigan, can lay claim to a strong record on civil rights, the Phoenix can find no evidence that the senior Romney actually marched with King, nor anything in the public record suggesting that he ever claimed to do so.

Reporter David Bernstein says that the Romney campaign initially told him the event occurred in 1968 during a King visit to Grosse Pointe, Michigan, but his research shows that there was no march and that Romney did not appear with King. In an update, he adds that “[a] spokesperson for Mitt Romney now tells the Phoenix that George W. Romney and Martin Luther King Jr. marched together in June, 1963 — although possibly not on the same day or in the same city.”

Continue reading Angels drop a buck for Huck, plus: Romney redefines “with”