|
|
By Eric Brewer, on July 14th, 2007
I’m puzzled. When Karl Rove finally spoke in public about the Plame Affair last week, he said that Armitage was the one who “used her name.” But didn’t Novak look it up in Who’s Who?
Aha. I see you subscribe to the immaculate leak theory of Plameogenesis.
It’s true that Novak started making that claim after the investigation began, but a couple of months earlier he told some reporters from Newsday, “I didn’t dig it out; it was given to me. They thought it was significant, they gave me the name, and I used it.”
They?
The “two senior administration officials” who were the sources for his original column.
And who were they again?
Armitage and Rove.
But how did Armitage and Rove know about Valerie?
Well, Armitage first heard about the Wilson affair from Marc Grossman, an Undersecretary of State. I’m not sure who told Rove.
And how did Mr. Grossman know?
Continue reading The one who used her name
By Eric Brewer, on July 3rd, 2007
At Slate, Timothy Noah has written a defense of Bush’s commutation of Scooter Libby’s jail sentence that is riddled with errors, fallacies, and non-sequiturs. To wit:
1. Noah says that Libby “probably didn’t understand that Plame’s identity was a government secret.” In fact, in Libby’s indictment, we read that:
Shortly after publication of the article in The New Republic, LIBBY spoke by telephone with his then Principal Deputy and discussed the article. That official asked LIBBY whether information about Wilson’s trip could be shared with the press to rebut the allegations that the Vice President had sent Wilson. LIBBY responded that there would be complications at the CIA in disclosing that information publicly, and that he could not discuss the matter on a non-secure telephone line.
This is pretty good evidence that Libby knew that Plame’s CIA identity was classified. Furthermore, Ari Fleischer testified that Libby told him that the Plame information was “hush hush” and “on the QT.”
Continue reading Why Timothy Noah is wrong about ‘Why Bush was right to spare Libby’
By Eric Brewer, on July 3rd, 2007
Today at the White House press briefing, I got into a somewhat heated (on my part) dispute with John Gizzi, political editor of the right wing web magazine HumanEvents.com. It happened like this…
Earlier in the briefing, the press was asking Tony Snow some pretty good questions about Bush’s commutation yesterday of Scooter Libby’s prison sentence. Questions like (this is a paraphrase): “What is it about this particular case that makes it so special that the president commuted the sentence without Libby even petitioning for a commutation, when there are 3,000 actual requests for commutation currently languishing at the Justice Department?” Tony’s (paraphrased) answer: “This case is just really, really special.” However, I was puzzled that all the reporters were referring only to Libby’s perjury convictions, and not to his conviction for obstruction of justice. So when Tony called on me, I asked:
Won’t this encourage other members of his administration to obstruct justice?”
Tony’s response:
No.
I got another chance, though, later on, during the following exchange:
Continue reading In which I lose my cool while debunking right wing Libby myths at the White House press briefing
By Eric Brewer, on June 14th, 2007
Threatening letters to Judge Walton are counterproductive. . . . → Read More: Judge defies threats, sends Libby to jail
By Eric Brewer, on March 6th, 2007
After six years of being lied to by the Bush administration and the pundits, the American people finally hold someone accountable… . . . → Read More: Guilty, Guilty, Guilty, Guilty
By Eric Brewer, on February 20th, 2007
Ted Wells wants Scooter back, Pat Fitzgerald would rather have the truth… . . . → Read More: “There is a cloud over the Vice President”: climactic moments from the Libby trial
By Weldon Berger, on February 14th, 2007
Tim Russert cemented his reputation as the Bruce Strauss of Washington journalism during his testimony at the Scooter Libby trial. During Sunday’s episode of Meet the Press, he gave other, lesser journalistic lights the opportunity to demean the profession each in their own imitable ways.
The Politico’s Roger Simon grabbed most of the attention from bloggers with his assertion that perjury and obstruction of justice are not crimes, and hence the Libby prosecution amounts to nothing more than a “show trial.” (Simon is making the rounds again on account of his publicly announced schoolgirl crush on GOP presidential candidate Mitt Romney). But it was Howard Kurtz who came up with perhaps the best line of the day when he asserted that the damage inflicted upon his profession by the trial is entirely a matter of misperception on the part of casual observers.
“I think that the people out there who don’t follow this all that closely think that we have become part of the club, too much the insiders,” said Kurtz. The obvious implication is that those who do pay detailed attention to the incestuous relationship between the Bush administration and the kow-towing Washington press community know that when Russert testifies under oath that his habit is to regard all conversations with top administration officials as off the record unless they specify otherwise, he’s describing the honorable practice of holding their official feet to the hottest flames of adversarial journalism. They quake each time they call him to get a slot on the show when things aren’t going well but they take the risk of subjecting themselves to his terrifying inquisitions because they know that if they come out alive, the viewing public will understand that their positions have withstood the ultimate test.
Continue reading In which Howie Kurtz shows why he’s da bomb
By Eric Brewer, on February 8th, 2007
Why are lefty bloggers embracing the defense’s attack on Russert’s credibility? . . . → Read More: Don’t buy the bad red herring
By Eric Brewer, on February 7th, 2007
Tim Russert delivers the prosecution’s knockout punch… . . . → Read More: “No, that would be impossible”: Russert’s dramatic testimony
By Eric Brewer, on February 6th, 2007
In his grand jury testimony that we heard today, Scooter Libby introduced a novel concept to the field of national security law… . . . → Read More: Scooter Libby and the Amazing Insta-Declassification Doctrine
|
Word of the Decade Ignoranus: An ignorant asshole.
|