<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>BTC News: If It Says 'News,' It Must Be True &#187;    Democrats</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.btcnews.com/btcnews/category/democrats/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.btcnews.com/btcnews</link>
	<description>BTC News: News, politics, opinion and satire</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 03:48:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Annoying tics among supporters of not the worst so hence the best possible president</title>
		<link>http://www.btcnews.com/btcnews/4975</link>
		<comments>http://www.btcnews.com/btcnews/4975#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 17:45:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Weldon Berger</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[   Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disasters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Weldon's Page]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.btcnews.com/btcnews/?p=4975</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>As I told the Speaker this summer, I’m prepared to make more reforms that rein in the long-term costs of Medicare and Medicaid, and strengthen Social Security, so long as those programs remain a guarantee of security for seniors.</p> <p>That&#8217;s the Best Possible President once again cutting off power to the Third Rail.</p> <p>Enthusiastic <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://www.btcnews.com/btcnews/4975">Annoying tics among supporters of not the worst so hence the best possible president</a></span>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>As I told the Speaker this summer, I’m prepared to make more reforms that rein in the long-term costs of Medicare and Medicaid, and strengthen Social Security, so long as those programs remain a guarantee of security for seniors.</em></p>
<p>That&#8217;s the Best Possible President once again cutting off power to the Third Rail.</p>
<p>Enthusiastic Obama supporters* do two really annoying things. Not annoying only to me, but objectively, cosmically annoying. If an alien visitor with no English and only a modest understanding of carbon-based life forms were to arrive and see these things, it would be annoyed.</p>
<p>The first is the preening over bin Laden&#8217;s death: &#8220;He killed bin Laden.&#8221; One sees this a lot from people defending Obama&#8217;s record. It&#8217;s annoying because Obama did not, of course, kill bin Laden—he said &#8220;Yes&#8221; when somebody asked him if he wanted the Seals to take a shot, as it were, at killing bin Laden—and because liberals found similar boasting from Bush supporters distasteful. &#8220;Cowboy!&#8221;**</p>
<p>The second is &#8220;THIS&#8221;. That&#8217;s what Obama supporters often say in reply to other Obama supporters who trot out the Psycho Republican excuse to explain away all the good stuff Obama didn&#8217;t do. Here&#8217;s how it works:</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>Jake</strong>: Of course it must be President Obama&#8217;s fault if he can&#8217;t do the things he said he&#8217;s try to do. Think back to high school civics — you remember any of that stuff about &#8220;checks and balances&#8221; or &#8220;separation of powers&#8221;? Yeah, me neither. On a serious note, if you want a system of government where the chief executive can do whatever he wants whenever he wants and be safely blamed for whatever goes wrong, I have a great one&#8230; it&#8217;s called &#8220;fascism.&#8221;</p>
<p><strong>Ducky</strong>: Jake: THIS</p></blockquote>
<p>As if Jake had just invented the concept of blaming the other guy. Those types of Obama supporters are bipolar: they&#8217;re either celebrating his ninja political skills—or toasting his ninja bin Laden-killing skills or, often enough, both—or they&#8217;re defending him as the hapless victim of a cruel fate masquerading as the federal legislature. &#8220;They tied him up. They threw him on the railroad tracks &#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>And then he cut Social Security while lying on that third rail facing down a speeding subway car filled with Psycho Republicans. Ninja!</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong><center>~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~</center></strong></p>
<p><strong>~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~<center></center></strong></p>
<p>*Adding, I forgot the disclaimer: yes, supporters of all of the Republican candidates with the exception of Fred Karger are at least as annoying.</p>
<p>**Adding, what&#8217;s possibly even more stupid is the comeback from Bush supporters who say &#8220;Obama couldn&#8217;t have done it without the policies put in place by George W. Bush,&#8221; as if the policy of &#8220;let&#8217;s find and kill the fucker who took down those buildings&#8221; is any more revelatory than Jake&#8217;s &#8220;let&#8217;s blame the other guy&#8221; epiphany.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.btcnews.com/btcnews/4975/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Scenarios for various outcomes of the Battle for the Soul of America</title>
		<link>http://www.btcnews.com/btcnews/4938</link>
		<comments>http://www.btcnews.com/btcnews/4938#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2012 21:07:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Weldon Berger</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[   Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[   Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Crimes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disasters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gentle Souls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newt Gingrich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Weldon's Page]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.btcnews.com/btcnews/?p=4938</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Now that Newt Gingrich has won the first round in the Confederate States primary contests—and O! what a victory it was; America&#8217;s demons are on the prowl and Newt is their advance man—it&#8217;s time to look at the various possible fates of the Soul of America depending upon who wins the battle for it. <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://www.btcnews.com/btcnews/4938">Scenarios for various outcomes of the Battle for the Soul of America</a></span>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now that Newt Gingrich has won the first round in the Confederate States primary contests—and O! what a victory it was; America&#8217;s demons are on the prowl and Newt is their advance man—it&#8217;s time to look at the various possible fates of the Soul of America depending upon who wins the battle for it.<br />
<span id="more-4938"></span><br />
<strong>Newt Gingrich</strong>: This has to be the fate that the Soul most dreads. If Newt takes the GOP nomination and goes on to win the general election, it is almost certain that he will keep the Soul in a secret room beneath the White House sub-basement, and he will visit it there in the dark in his bleakest moments and make it perform unspeakable acts of a sort that would make the Devil shudder. It is devoutly to be hoped that Newt does not get to take the Soul of America home, and fortunately, it&#8217;s extremely unlikely that he will. Unless he roofies the Soul at his concession party.</p>
<p><strong>Willard M. Romney</strong>: This is easy. If Mitt wins the GOP nomination and the general election, he&#8217;ll sell off all the Soul&#8217;s assets. Whatever remains of the Soul after that, he&#8217;ll trade to the Devil for future considerations.</p>
<p><strong>Barack Obama</strong>: Obama seems almost certain to win the Democratic party nomination for president and, given the sudden carnivorous turn the Republicans have taken, only slightly less certain to win the general election.</p>
<p>If he does win, he&#8217;ll probably lodge the Soul in comfort at Camp David, careful to keep it away from newspapers and the internet—what if the Soul developed a taste for news or porn on the president&#8217;s watch? We don&#8217;t need another custody battle so soon—and promise it a job in a year or two, maybe three, four tops. He&#8217;ll trot it out for feel-good state functions involving one-legged champion wrestlers or universally beloved school teachers or the opening of a solar panel manufacturing facility, and fit it with a pair of custom-made blinders to wear on those occasions when the president is about to do something truly depraved, like strike a deal with Republicans to reduce Medicare benefits or blow up a bunch of third-world women and kids for no good reason. Because there are some things you don&#8217;t want the Soul of America to see, for the good of us all.</p>
<p><strong>Ron Paul</strong>: If Ron Paul wins the battle for the Soul of America, the Soul is pretty much on its own and will likely end up as a massively pregnant stoner panhandling on a street corner and passing out fliers warning against an impending assault by forces of the outlawed Federal Reserve.</p>
<p>Vote wisely, vote well and vote often.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.btcnews.com/btcnews/4938/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why panicked liberals hate Ron Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.btcnews.com/btcnews/4928</link>
		<comments>http://www.btcnews.com/btcnews/4928#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 20:59:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Weldon Berger</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[   Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[   Eat the Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[   Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Crimes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disasters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exploding Brains]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ron Paul]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.btcnews.com/btcnews/?p=4928</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>A quick word (two, really) for liberals incensed that other liberals and leftists are attracted to the anti-imperialist, anti-authoritarian soundings of Ron Paul: fuck off. If you don&#8217;t like that people are praising a guy they would otherwise regard as just another demented freak filling out the field of demented freaks (and the one <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://www.btcnews.com/btcnews/4928">Why panicked liberals hate Ron Paul</a></span>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A quick word (two, really) for liberals incensed that other liberals and leftists are attracted to the anti-imperialist, anti-authoritarian soundings of Ron Paul: fuck off. If you don&#8217;t like that people are praising a guy they would otherwise regard as just another demented freak filling out the field of demented freaks (and the one malfunctioning but apparently unstoppable golem) running for the GOP nomination, then address the reason they&#8217;re doing so. </p>
<p>We have not a single prominent political figure to the left of your average John Birch Society aficionado speaking out against eternal war and our increasingly predatory national security state. People who oppose those sorts of things are desperately parched. The overwhelming number of Obama supporters glide past these issues as though they don&#8217;t exist; once Paul is off stage again, you will not hear a whisper of anti-imperial criticism from them aimed at the president. And that is precisely why those outraged liberals want him off stage again, and want any attention or praise paid his rhetoric in the meanwhile to be seen as beyond the pale.</p>
<p>Barack Obama believes the national security state and the American military empire are good and valuable things. He likes them. He uses them enthusiastically. Ron Paul believes all sorts of weird and unsavory shit, but he doesn&#8217;t believe that the national security state and the American military empire are good and valuable things. You don&#8217;t want Ron Paul siphoning off liberal/left enthusiasm? Then take those issues away from him and make them your own; they are, after all, progressive bread and butter issues. Can&#8217;t, though, can you?</p>
<p>(Obama also used his Nobel Peace Prize acceptance lecture to mount a stirring defense of the Bush doctrine of preemptive war, which makes him not only an imperialist and authoritarian but an enormous asshole as well. And doesn&#8217;t say a lot for the Nobel selection committee either. But that&#8217;s another story.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.btcnews.com/btcnews/4928/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reaching out to underserved communities, Obama hires bank, pipeline lobbyist</title>
		<link>http://www.btcnews.com/btcnews/4775</link>
		<comments>http://www.btcnews.com/btcnews/4775#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2011 16:16:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Weldon Berger</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[   Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Crimes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disasters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Weldon's Page]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.btcnews.com/btcnews/?p=4775</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The Obama campaign has drawn a line in the tar sand, and if you&#8217;re reading this you&#8217;re probably on the wrong side of it. A former lobbyist for TransCanada, the giant energy company desperate to build a pipeline from Canada&#8217;s oil tar sand fields through the US to Gulf Coast refineries, is the latest <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://www.btcnews.com/btcnews/4775">Reaching out to underserved communities, Obama hires bank, pipeline lobbyist</a></span>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Obama campaign has drawn a line in the tar sand, and if you&#8217;re reading this you&#8217;re probably on the wrong side of it. A former lobbyist for TransCanada, the giant energy company desperate to build a pipeline from Canada&#8217;s oil tar sand fields through the US to Gulf Coast refineries, is the latest high-powered addition to the campaign.<br />
<span id="more-4775"></span><br />
Along with TransCanada, lobbyist <a href="http://www.opensecrets.org/news/2011/10/broderick-johnson-revolving-door.html">Broderick Johnson&#8217;s clients</a> have included mortgage fraud factory Bank of America; the failed government-backed mortgage company Fannie Mae; and JP Morgan Chase, one of the most favored firms under the Bush/Obama bank bailout scheme. </p>
<p>Balancing out Johnson&#8217;s work on behalf of financial pirates and purveyors of environmental mayhem is his marriage to Michelle Norris, who must be liberal because she works at NPR.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.btcnews.com/btcnews/4775/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Let&#8217;s trade Obama to Canada for players to be named later</title>
		<link>http://www.btcnews.com/btcnews/4728</link>
		<comments>http://www.btcnews.com/btcnews/4728#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Oct 2011 18:32:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Weldon Berger</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[   Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[   Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[   Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Crimes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disasters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exploding Brains]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreigners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Progressives!]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vile Commerce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Weldon's Page]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.btcnews.com/btcnews/?p=4728</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I just completed a frank exchange of views with a devout Obama supporter who believes her president is curbing his liberal impulses from respect for the views of the losing voters on the right (they did lose, didn&#8217;t they?) and in order to establish a dynamic in which subsequent right-wing presidents will moderate their <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://www.btcnews.com/btcnews/4728">Let&#8217;s trade Obama to Canada for players to be named later</a></span>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just completed a frank exchange of views with a devout Obama supporter who believes her president is curbing his liberal impulses from respect for the views of the losing voters on the right (they did lose, didn&#8217;t they?) and in order to establish a dynamic in which subsequent right-wing presidents will moderate their own ambitions from respect for Obama&#8217;s example and the voters who support it.</p>
<p>Well. Not exactly <em>her</em> president. She&#8217;s Canadian, although also Floridian. Hot Sun Bakes Canadian Brain. In the end we agreed that when Rick Perry invades Iran in five years after taking office by winning 45% of the popular vote, I will deserve to be drafted and sent off to fight and presumably die in that war because I think Democrats should pursue big projects like universal health care, the cramming of which down American throats led George W. Bush to invade Iraq. Damn you, Harry Truman!<br />
<span id="more-4728"></span><br />
(Too, this means America will lose because if the time comes when I&#8217;m 1) drafted and 2) expected to actually fight, that will be the time when our Great Country is dead on its feet.)</p>
<p>This synopsis is much, much closer to how the actual discussion went than it is to a caricature of the actual discussion, although it is several days shorter than the real thing. Along the way I learned how people like me—loud-mouthed unreasoning lefties—cost Democrats the 2010 midterm elections even though though they didn&#8217;t. Because they must have! Even though independents who went for Democrats by nearly 20 points in the 2006 midterms went for Republicans by nearly 20 points in the 2010 midterms because, well, Obama. And Democrats. But a 40-point swing in a third of the electorate was not the issue; it was me. Me! Fuck! What was I thinking!</p>
<p>Okay. Well. Canadians, whattayagonnado.</p>
<p><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-4743" title="cheney last moments" src="http://www.btcnews.com/btcnews/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/cheney-last-moments1.jpg" alt="" width="345" height="438" />Just kidding. Very nice people. Don&#8217;t do well in hot climates, though.</p>
<p>One good thing about Obama, he&#8217;s not making up <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/oct/19/iran-dissident-saudi-ambassador-plot?newsfeed=true">crazy bullshit about Iran</a> the way the Bushies did about Iraq. So the war really will be Rick Perry&#8217;s fault. My fault.</p>
<p>Where are George W. Bush and Dick Cheney living these days, anyway? Shouldn&#8217;t we be slapping sanctions on those joints for harboring war criminals? Freezing assets? Travel sanctions for top officials? Preventing <a href="http://www.serioussportsnewsnetwork.com/2007/11/dallas-cowboys-donated-to-president-bush-in-exchange-for-early-end-to-presidency.html">their sporting franchises</a> from competing with those in other, less benighted locales?</p>
<p>Light up the gated entrance at Preston Hollow with Hellfire missiles for a few nights and pretty soon a group of masked billionaires will be dropping a trussed-up W out in the street under a white flag. <a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/05/03/obama_drone_joke_jonas_brothers/">There</a> is <a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/world_now/2011/10/yemen-drone-awlaki-son-family.html">precedent</a>!</p>
<p>Cheney, though: I think we all know how that will end if his neighbors try to bring him in alive. First one through the door takes a shotgun to the face.</p>
<p>Do the Canadians deserve Obama? Sure: they elected Stephen Harper, so their standards obviously aren&#8217;t what they used to be. And evidently most of them went home afterward and never came out to vote again. It&#8217;s possible they won&#8217;t even notice we sent Obama up there, especially if we time it for <em>Hockey Night in Canada</em>. At least until they start getting notices from Canada Revenue that they have to buy Aetna health insurance or else.</p>
<p>If they don&#8217;t notice we sent him we can&#8217;t every well demand anyone in return, but <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tommy_Douglas">Tommy Douglas</a> is deader&#8217;n Nixon so who cares anyway? Maybe we can work out a three-way deal to get <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luiz_In%C3%A1cio_Lula_da_Silva">Lula</a> from Brazil, since he&#8217;s a free agent now. Meanwhile, Biden can hold down the fort here with one foot tied behind his mouth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.btcnews.com/btcnews/4728/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

