<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>BTC News: If It Says 'News,' It Must Be True &#187;    Blogs On Parade</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.btcnews.com/btcnews/category/blogs-on-parade/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.btcnews.com/btcnews</link>
	<description>BTC News: News, politics, opinion and satire</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 03:48:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Blogs on Parade: &#8220;They&#8217;re Wrong About Everything&#8221; edition</title>
		<link>http://www.btcnews.com/btcnews/4968</link>
		<comments>http://www.btcnews.com/btcnews/4968#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 01:49:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Weldon Berger</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[   Blogs On Parade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[   Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Crimes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disasters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Weldon's Page]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.btcnews.com/btcnews/?p=4968</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I have been lazy about referring the two of you to other blogs. I keep forgetting that it&#8217;s perfectly legitimate in this business to just quote stuff and then say I wrote something, which makes me feel better about not having written anything. Here are some things that people I like have found other <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://www.btcnews.com/btcnews/4968">Blogs on Parade: &#8220;They&#8217;re Wrong About Everything&#8221; edition</a></span>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been lazy about referring the two of you to other blogs. I keep forgetting that it&#8217;s perfectly legitimate in this business to just quote stuff and then say I wrote something, which makes me feel better about not having written anything. Here are some things that people I like have found other people to be fantastically wrong about.</p>
<p><a href="http://the-crows-eye.blogspot.com">Jack Crow</a> on the <a href="http://the-crows-eye.blogspot.com/2012/01/compromise.html">threat to traditional marriage</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>If you&#8217;re looking for what degrades or corrupts the, heh, marriage bond, you ain&#8217;t ever going to find it the affections and affectations of homosexuals. But, you will find a whole lot of sundered wedded union in the wake of deployment, military industrial centralization and the austerity which follows war upon war. That shit is disruptive. The gays, not so much.</p></blockquote>
<p><span id="more-4968"></span><br />
I already mentioned this in my own universally praised assessment of the State of the Union speech, but the IOZ take on the Obama invocation of the US as the &#8220;<a href="http://whoisioz.blogspot.com/2012/01/straits-of-union.html">indispensable nation</a>&#8221; deserves immortality.</p>
<blockquote><p>Did he say anything interesting?  Jobs, mortgages, jobs, business, taxes.  I seem to recall some generic bellicosity toward Iran and I definitely remember hearing that hoary Albrightism, &#8220;the indispensable nation.&#8221;  I have always enjoyed that phrase.  It suggests a single, sad bag of Cheetohs resting lazily between the coil and the glass, refusing to fall into the hopper, and a single, sad, very fat man banging a futile palm against the other side of the vending machine.</p></blockquote>
<p>And anyone who says otherwise is probably wrong about everything else, too.</p>
<p>Way back when, the day after he got elected, I characterized Obama as the compassionate conservative that people goofily pretended George Bush would be. <a href="http://sideshow.me.uk/">Avedon Carol</a> thinks I was wrong <a href="http://sideshow.me.uk/sjan12.htm#1201250520">about that</a>.</p>
<blockquote><p>Remember, George W. Bush tried to privatize Social Security, but he failed, and he failed because people &#8211; with liberals leading the charge &#8211; fought back, to the point where even registered Republicans realized what was going on and called their GOP Congresscreeps and let them know they&#8217;d never get another vote from them if they signed on to this outrage. Now Obama is trying to wreck Social Security, and where are those people? Well, they&#8217;re not telling people to call their Congressmen, because they are still too busy telling us how awful the Republicans are, as if only the Republicans were doing anything outrageous.</p></blockquote>
<p>Left I on the News scientifically proves that Syria&#8217;s Bashir al-Assad is <a href="http://lefti.blogspot.com/2012/01/death-in-iraq.html">just like Hitler</a>. </p>
<blockquote><p>Today on the news, a Syrian defector was talking about the &#8220;genocide&#8221; taking place in Syria, where an alleged (but hardly proven) 5000 deaths (of both opposition forces and government troops) have taken place. I have yet to hear on the news anyone applying the word &#8220;genocide&#8221; to the 1.3 million Iraqis who have met their fate at the hands of the U.S. government.
</p></blockquote>
<p>You&#8217;ll have to read it to get the context for the 1.3 million, but no matter which way you lean there are lots of people in Iraq whose fates turned all the way bad when the US invaded. </p>
<p>And so on. Coming soon, it turns out that at some point in the not-too-distant future, the machines did in fact win. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.btcnews.com/btcnews/4968/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>So Tu, Bluto?</title>
		<link>http://www.btcnews.com/btcnews/4951</link>
		<comments>http://www.btcnews.com/btcnews/4951#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 20:16:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Weldon Berger</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[   Blogs On Parade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[   Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Crimes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disasters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newt Gingrich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama Administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Progressives!]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vile Commerce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Weldon's Page]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.btcnews.com/btcnews/?p=4951</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t get around to reading the State of the Union speech until this morning because the idiot White House didn&#8217;t post a transcript on their web site before I went to bed last night, and be damned if I&#8217;m going to subject myself to the audiovisual torment of a major political speech ever <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://www.btcnews.com/btcnews/4951">So Tu, Bluto?</a></span>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t get around to reading the State of the Union speech until this morning because the idiot White House didn&#8217;t post a transcript on their web site before I went to bed last night, and be damned if I&#8217;m going to subject myself to the audiovisual torment of a major political speech ever again. So I apologize to both of you for not responding immediately, as I hear that some malevolent homunculus from my former home state, Indiana, did.</p>
<p>The speech can be divided into two parts: the part that recognized and cashed in on all the pressure toward economic justice that Occupy created* during the past four months, and the part that didn&#8217;t.<br />
<span id="more-4951"></span><br />
The first part you can just write off to the campaign. Come January 20 of next year—which is a Sunday, so the actual public inauguration might be held on Monday the 21st, but that&#8217;s Martin Luther King Day, so maybe it&#8217;ll be the 22nd—the Fierce Urgency of Those People will either be misplaced by President Obama or murdered, chopped into bite-sized nuggets and eaten by President Romnich and guests at the inaugural dinner.</p>
<blockquote><p>The defining issue of our time is how to keep [the basic American promise that if you worked hard, you could do well enough to raise a family, own a home, send your kids to college, and put a little away for retirement] alive. No challenge is more urgent. No debate is more important. We can either settle for a country where a shrinking number of people do really well while a growing number of Americans barely get by, or we can restore an economy where everyone gets a fair shot, and everyone does their fair share, and everyone plays by the same set of rules. (Applause.) What’s at stake aren’t Democratic values or Republican values, but American values. And we have to reclaim them.</p>
<p>Let’s remember how we got here. Long before the recession, jobs and manufacturing began leaving our shores. Technology made businesses more efficient, but also made some jobs obsolete. Folks at the top saw their incomes rise like never before, but most hardworking Americans struggled with costs that were growing, paychecks that weren’t, and personal debt that kept piling up.</p></blockquote>
<p>And then there&#8217;s a bunch of other economic populist stuff, and the thing about how he&#8217;s created a commission to investigate and prosecute financial piracy, and it will work hand-in-hand with the Justice Department task force that has been charged with shielding financial pirates from investigation and prosecution and sending them off with a slap on the wrist and a cup of sweet tea, and some other things, and if for a moment the president thought any of this stuff would put a crimp in his campaign&#8217;s capacity to raise pirated funds from the pirate industry, he wouldn&#8217;t say it or do it. High-level campaign operatives were dispatched to strategic locations in Manhattan and various Caribbean isles with DVDs of a more realistic speech, along with gift bags containing bottles of 50-year-old single malt whiskey and bags of dried, salted peasant ears.</p>
<p>So you can write all that shit off. Then there was the Pinky and The Brain stuff about taking over the world. He praised the troops that were sent off to fight the war that he called wrong and stupid at the time but now says &#8220;made the United States safer and more respected around the world.&#8221; I guess that was inevitable;  it would be challenging to stand up and tell all those soldiers and such that their lives, vaporized limbs and brutalized minds had contributed mightily to the deeply screwed condition in which we find ourselves today, and incidentally killed, displaced, maimed or permanently traumatized almost everyone who lives in Iraq.</p>
<p>And Iran. We can&#8217;t forget Iran. The president stopped short of the <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/news/opinion/story/2012-01-17/John-Bolton-Iran-military-action/52623920/1">full John Bolton</a> on Iran, but did his best to convey the impression that contrary to the opinions of intelligence agencies in the US and, incredibly, Israel, and that of the International Atomic Energy Agency, Iran has a nuclear weapons program and the US will smite the Iranians hip and thigh (old-timey for &#8220;nuke the shit out of &#8216;em&#8221;) before we&#8217;ll let them get away with building the nuclear weapons that they&#8217;re not trying to build.</p>
<p>All props to John Bolton, by the way. Among all the people who imply or insist that Iran is building nuclear weapons and can&#8217;t be allowed to succeed, he&#8217;s one of the few who advocate what the delusion (or lie) truly demands, which is an all-out attack on Iran to end their ambitions forever. Sanctions? Pfffffft.</p>
<p>And finally, for the best formulation to date, and likely forever, addressing any aspect of the speech, I <a href="http://whoisioz.blogspot.com/2012/01/straits-of-union.html">turn to IOZ</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>I seem to recall some generic bellicosity toward Iran and I definitely remember hearing that hoary Albrightism, &#8220;the indispensable nation.&#8221; I have always enjoyed that phrase. It suggests a single, sad bag of Cheetohs resting lazily between the coil and the glass, refusing to fall into the hopper, and a single, sad, very fat man banging a futile palm against the other side of the vending machine.</p></blockquote>
<p><center><strong>~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~<br />
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~</strong></center><br />
*A while back, in response to somebody denying the role of Occupy in the president&#8217;s sudden awakening to issues of  economic justice, I took a little stroll through the Google News archives to check on the frequency in institutional press sources of the phrase &#8220;income inequality&#8221; during the period between September 18, when the Occupy protests began, and December 7, when Obama made his Teddy Roosevelt-lite speech. I compared it year to year to the same period in the previous four years. Here&#8217;s what I found.</p>
<p>2007: 116 instances.</p>
<p>2008: 112 instances.</p>
<p>2009: 54 instances.</p>
<p>2010: 106 instances.</p>
<p>2011: 3,270 instances.</p>
<p>You&#8217;ll notice there&#8217;s a roughly 3,000% jump in the 2011 period from the previous high. Hey, I wonder what could account for that?</p>
<p>Just for good measure, here&#8217;s the result from the three-month period immediately preceding the beginning of the Occupy protests, from June 18 of 2011 to September 18 of 2011: 44 instances.</p>
<p>So I don&#8217;t want to hear no shit about the lack of clarity or effectiveness of the Occupy message and protests. If the president is Newton and economic justice is gravity, then Occupy is the dude who walked up behind Newton and slugged him with a branch and shouted &#8220;Gravity!&#8221; just as the apple fell upon his head.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.btcnews.com/btcnews/4951/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Happy Birthday To US: BTC News is eight years old</title>
		<link>http://www.btcnews.com/btcnews/4681</link>
		<comments>http://www.btcnews.com/btcnews/4681#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2011 04:00:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Weldon Berger</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[   Blogs On Parade]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.btcnews.com/btcnews/?p=4681</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Hard to believe but there it is: Monday, October 10, will be the eighth anniversary of our first published post. Cliches notwithstanding, among the just shy of 3,000 days since I got this thing up and running have been quite a few very strange ones. Thanks for everything &#8230;</p> ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hard to believe but there it is: Monday, October 10, will be the eighth anniversary of our <a href="http://www.btcnews.com/btcnews/12">first published post</a>. Cliches notwithstanding, among the just shy of 3,000 days since I got this thing up and running have been quite a few very strange ones. Thanks for everything &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.btcnews.com/btcnews/4681/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The fabulous new BTC News forum</title>
		<link>http://www.btcnews.com/btcnews/4621</link>
		<comments>http://www.btcnews.com/btcnews/4621#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2011 18:45:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Weldon Berger</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[   Blogs On Parade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[   General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Weldon's Page]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.btcnews.com/btcnews/?p=4621</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;ve added a bulletin board-like thing to the site which at some point will be integrated with the blog but for now is separate. You will find it here. It&#8217;s very basic and wholly undecorated at the moment, but presumably the decoration pixies will stop in sometime and remedy that. </p> <p>Meanwhile, I&#8217;ll appreciate <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://www.btcnews.com/btcnews/4621">The fabulous new BTC News forum</a></span>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;ve added a bulletin board-like thing to the site which at some point will be integrated with the blog but for now is separate. You will <a href="http://forums.btcnews.com/">find it here</a>. It&#8217;s very basic and wholly undecorated at the moment, but presumably the decoration pixies will stop in sometime and remedy that. </p>
<p>Meanwhile, I&#8217;ll appreciate feedback from anyone who cares to visit the thing and tool around in it a bit. Drop a comment in the &#8220;feedback&#8221; category over there or in comments to this post. Thanks &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.btcnews.com/btcnews/4621/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Blogs on Parade: &#8220;The Negro&#8217;s Revenge&#8221; edition</title>
		<link>http://www.btcnews.com/btcnews/4404</link>
		<comments>http://www.btcnews.com/btcnews/4404#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2011 20:58:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Weldon Berger</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[   Arts & Letters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[   Blogs On Parade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Crimes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disasters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama Administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Socialism!]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vile Commerce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Weldon's Page]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.btcnews.com/btcnews/?p=4404</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>From Lenin&#8217;s Tomb, a lefty Brit blog run by Richard Seymour, comes this on the recent London riots: </p> <p>On the history of British reactionaries blaming black music for riots and disorder:</p> <p>&#8220;It is deplorable. It is tribal. And it is from America. It follows rag-time, blues, dixie, jazz, hot cha-cha and the boogie-woogie, <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://www.btcnews.com/btcnews/4404">Blogs on Parade: &#8220;The Negro&#8217;s Revenge&#8221; edition</a></span>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>From <em><a href="http://leninology.blogspot.com/">Lenin&#8217;s Tomb</a></em></strong>, a lefty Brit blog run by Richard Seymour, <a href="http://leninology.blogspot.com/2011/08/blame-it-on-boogie-woogie.html">comes this</a> on the recent London riots: </p>
<blockquote><p>On the history of British reactionaries <a href="http://www.economist.com/blogs/bagehot/2011/08/civil-disorder-and-looting-hits-britain-0">blaming black music for riots and disorder</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;It is deplorable. It is tribal. And it is from America. It follows rag-time, blues, dixie, jazz, hot cha-cha and the boogie-woogie, which surely originated in the jungle. We sometimes wonder whether this is the negro&#8217;s revenge.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
</blockquote>
<p><span id="more-4404"></span><br />
The link in Seymour&#8217;s post is to a bit in the stodgy old <a href="http://www.economist.com/">Economist</a> of all places. He&#8217;s written a lot on the topic, all worth reading (including most recently this on &#8220;<a href="http://leninology.blogspot.com/2011/08/sadistic-state.html">the sadistic state</a>&#8220;). Give him a look.</p>
<p><strong>From Avedon Carol&#8217;s <a href="http://sideshow.me.uk/">Sideshow</a></strong>, a comment on the <a href="http://sideshow.me.uk/saug11.htm#1108101609">political acid test</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>Back when Ross Perot was running for president, I marvelled at his apparent belief that all we needed was for someone to go to Washington and, I don&#8217;t know, put LSD in the water so everyone would love each other and get along? Really, his entire governing strategy, as he explained it, seemed to be, &#8220;I&#8217;m going to go there and make &#8216;em all shake hands and get some real work done.&#8221; No recognition of the huge ideological gulf between the two sides, just this bizarre Woodstock Nation kind of philosophy that even in the &#8217;60s you couldn&#8217;t have sold to a bunch of stoned hippies. But people who look kindly on Obama seem to think that he has the same weird, Sunshine Acid kind of thinking, as if it was all about needing his own special personality to make the flower-wreathed fairy circle emerge.
</p></blockquote>
<p>And more. She always has great links.</p>
<p><strong>From Michael Shaw&#8217;s <a href="http://www.bagnewsnotes.com">Bag News Notes</a></strong>, a comment on British PM David Cameron&#8217;s odd choice to deliver <a href="http://www.bagnewsnotes.com/2011/08/is-david-cameron-bigger-than-graffiti/">a reactionary screed</a> in front of rather well-done bit of graffiti:</p>
<blockquote><p>I’m confused. I suppose Team Cameron chose to situated [<em>sic</em>] its “law and order” screed in front of a graffiti mural at a youth center to signify that the same culture that spawns such art is about to get its head handed to it?</p>
<p>Don’t they get that graffiti, and the combination of alienation, frustration, and yearning for identity and expression that underpins it, is the exact thing that Cameron is denying? Unless I’m missing something here, this has got to be one of the most blind and provocative political images I’ve seen in some time.</p></blockquote>
<p>Bag News Notes is all about the images, so you really have to visit <a href="http://www.bagnewsnotes.com/2011/08/is-david-cameron-bigger-than-graffiti/">the link</a> to see what Shaw&#8217;s talking about. Also from Shaw, during the height of the Midwest floods, a brilliant catch of a visual allegory for the <a href="http://www.bagnewsnotes.com/2011/07/and-then-came-the-floods/">plight of the American worker</a>.</p>
<p><strong>From the Columbia Journalism Review&#8217;s <a href="http://www.cjr.org/the_audit/">Audit Note</a></strong>, Ryan Chittum lauds coverage of the Obama administration&#8217;s <a href="http://www.cjr.org/the_audit/audit_notes_bankers_good_fha_w.php">cozy relationships</a> with economic arsonists:</p>
<blockquote><p> The American Banker’s Jeff Horwitz has another <a href="http://www.americanbanker.com/issues/176_158/fha-david-stevens-accouting-1041209-1.html?pg=1">excellent report</a> on the Federal Housing Administration and its former commissioner David Stevens, who took a bold spin through the revolving door earlier this year to become CEO of the Mortgage Bankers Association.
</p></blockquote>
<p>Chittum also takes note of a Center for Public Integrity story about the FBI&#8217;s <a href="http://www.iwatchnews.org/2011/08/15/5799/fbi-brags-about-chasing-down-mortgage-fraudsters-big-banks-are-left-untouched/page/0/1?utm_source=iwatch&#038;utm_medium=social_media&#038;utm_campaign=twitter">lackadaisical approach</a> to mortgage fraud investigations.</p>
<p><strong>And finally, what my daughter said</strong> I had to hear: Splendid, splendid heartbreaking chops.<br />
.<br />
<center><iframe width="560" height="349" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/rYEDA3JcQqw" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>
<p>.<br />
<a href="http://www.twitter.com/weldonberger"><img src="http://twitter-badges.s3.amazonaws.com/follow_me-a.png" alt="Follow weldonberger on Twitter"/></a></center></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.btcnews.com/btcnews/4404/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

