From the date here I don’t know if this site is still active. However, if it is, I wanted to let you know that I thought your opening question today (10/13/05)and follow up was brilliant. Indeed, it was one of the most impressive cross-examination traps I’ve ever seen. You were setting up the WH to not only state that false terrorist threats were terror itself, but that the person that issued that threat was a terrorist. Given that even the MSM (Olberman) is reporting lately that false terror threats are routinely released by the WH, this (as I believe you intended) has the consequence of putting the WH into the “terrorist” definition.

Given the above, I truly love the second part of the first question: Do you think these people should be hunted down and brought to justice?