14
May

Iraq: A Family Affair

From AP via the Houston Chronicle:

Staff Sgt. Samuel T. Castle of Naples died Wednesday from injuries suffered from an improvised explosive device in Al Asad, the Department of Defense said Friday. He was assigned to the Army’s 327th Signal Battalion, 35th Signal Brigade, Fort Bragg, N.C.

Both Samuel Castle and his wife, Nicole, a soldier in the 51st Signal Battalion, were sent to Iraq at the end of November, leaving their 1-year-old son, also named Samuel, with her parents. The soldier also has a 6-year-old daughter, Mia, who lives in Dallas, Payne said.

Payne said the funeral is expected to be May 21, but they have not yet set a time. She said the soldier’s wife
and his 19-year-old brother — who followed him into the military and is also serving in Iraq
— would be coming to Texas for the funeral.

Maybe one or the other of the parents were offered the opportunity to stay home. One would like to think so.

How long can this go on? The Army has missed its recruiting goals for several consecutive months despite Herculean efforts (cheating) by some Army recruiters. The Marines aren’t doing much better, and despite recurrent promises that the troops will be brought home (alive) in increasing numbers, the number in Iraq continues to hover around 140,000.

For those who don’t recall, the original plan was to cut the number of US troops in Iraq to 30,000 by September of 2003.

The United States said it planned to set up an international force in three regions of Iraq, with Poland and Britain controlling two zones and U.S. forces the third. Denmark, the Netherlands, Italy, Spain, Ukraine and Bulgaria would also provide troops.

As part of that realignment, senior U.S. officers said the Bush administration is planning to withdraw most U.S. combat forces from Iraq over the next several months and wants to shrink the American military presence in Iraq from five divisions to less than two divisions by the fall.

If the administration’s plan is carried out, the number of American troops in Iraq would be reduced from more than 130,000 soldiers and Marines to 30,000 or fewer by this fall.

Here are a couple of other troop strength notices. From October 19, 2003:

WASHINGTON – U.S. military commanders have developed a plan to steadily cut back troop levels in Iraq next year, several senior Army officers said in recent interviews.

There now are 130,000 U.S. troops in Iraq. The plan to cut that number is well advanced and has been described in broad outline to Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld but hasn’t yet been approved by him.

It would begin to draw down forces next spring, cutting the number of troops to fewer than 100,000 by next summer and then to 50,000 by mid-2005, officers involved in the planning said.

From January 24, 2005:

The U.S. Army expects to keep its troop strength in Iraq at the current level of about 120,000 for at least two more years, according to the Army’s top operations officer.

While allowing for the possibility that the levels could decrease or increase depending on security conditions and other factors, Lt. Gen. James J. Lovelace Jr. told reporters yesterday that the assumption of little change through 2006 represents “the most probable case.”

From April 11, 2005:

Two years after the fall of Saddam Hussein, the American-led military campaign in Iraq is making enough progress in fighting insurgents and training Iraqi security forces to allow the Pentagon to plan for significant troop reductions by early next year, senior commanders and Pentagon officials say. Senior American officers are wary of declaring success too soon against an insurgency they say still has perhaps 12,000 to 20,000 hard-core fighters, plentiful financing and the ability to change tactics quickly to carry out deadly attacks. But there is a consensus emerging among these top officers and other senior defense officials about several positive developing trends, although each carries a cautionary note.

Sending both parents of an infant into a war … that’s insane.

3 Responses to “Iraq: A Family Affair”

  1. 1
    porn movie trailer Says:

    porn movie trailer

    porn movie trailer

  2. 2
    Diana Loucks Says:

    I understand freedom of the press and all but you absolutely no right to use a soldier’s demise and his family situation for the betterment of your anti-iraq efforts without the permisssion of his/her family. It is completely and totally disrespectful to the sacrifice that Sam Castle made to politically exploit it. As a friend of the Castle family I guarantee you that if you had contacted Nicole Castle, she would have expressed her outrage at the use of this article about her husband’s sacrifice and her family’s loss.

  3. 3
    Diana Loucks Says:

    To answer the question posted on the webpage about whether or not you wonder if they were offered the opportunity to stay behind — the Army understands that dual military couples exist, and even exist within the same Brigades and Battalions. Dual military couples understand that unless there are extenuating circumstances — extreme illness of either parent or that of the child, etc., (at the discression of the command), then neither will be asked to stay behind. The Army requires family care plans per Army Regulation 600-20 (check this link http://www.usapa.army.mil/pdffiles/r600_20.pdf), page 37, to ensure that the children are cared for in the instance that one or both of the parents does not return. If a care plan does not exist, then one if not both of the parents are asked to leave Army service for their priority on the care of their families will then not be consistent with the values of the Army.

Leave a Reply

BTC News: If It Says ‘News,’ It Must Be True is is proudly powered by Wordpress
Navigation Theme by GPS Gazette