12
May
In which Barack Obama cleans up among the homeless
Barack Obama is the clear choice of homeless people, at least those in the Venice and Santa Monica, CA, environs, for president. Despite polling that shows Hillary Clinton doing generally better among the backbone Democratic constituencies—blue collar workers and the poor, to the extent those are distinct groups these days—almost no one in the parks and alleys and food lines supports her other than a few who think an Obama presidency would be aimed exclusively at advancing the lot of black Americans.
Hardly anyone agrees with the official BTC News position, which is that whichever Democrat wins the nomination and presumably the presidency will be so crippled by recession, interest on the national debt, the cost of Iraq and Afghanistan—where we will remain for the duration—and the inevitable burst of Democratic congressional corruption, when the party wins its near-bulletproof majority, that they’ll do little to improve the lot of displaced persons even should they have the inclination, which isn’t at all obvious.
Regardless the realities, though, Obama, assuming he gets the nomination, will collect virtually all the homeless votes here. That could amount to about three unless someone makes an effort to register the community and scrape them off the streets in time to get to the polls, but a demographic dominated is a demographic dominated.
In truth, the needs are so overwhelming that no traditional Democratic candidate would even dream of attempting to address them. The great majority of homeless people are in desperate need of psychiatric aid or substance abuse treatment or both, and those things are in desperately short supply.
Being homeless is mentally and physically exhausting; when you see homeless people laid out during the day, the chances are good that it’s because they spent the night getting chased out of doorways, parking lots and parks, and they’re attempting to catch up on their sleep. Since services for the crowd are only available during the day, many homeless people eventually give up on obtaining them because of the consuming need for sleep.
The most basic unmet need of the homeless is a home. Shelters are in short supply, and ones that can provide a bed continuously for the months or longer necessary to integrate people into rehabilitation programs of any stripe are even more rare, as is permanent, low-cost housing. Not to say that everyone is a good candidate for the services, but more often than not the ones who aren’t have simply been ground down to human shells lacking the capacity to strive. Most people can handle only so much indignity, discomfort, physical strain and mental stress before sinking into semi-consciousness. Lots of homeless people smell bad because after a while the relatively simple act of locating an accessible shower requires an unsustainable effort of will.
We’re talking tens of billions of dollars to eradicate homelessness. We need many more social workers and mental health professionals, along with traditional health care workers. We need many more short- and long-term shelters, and tens of thousands of permanent, low-cost housing units. In short, we need an all-out refugee assistance program like the one that should have been, but wasn’t, in place after Hurricane Katrina, and we need to sustain it for decades despite the inevitable sense of intractability that will at some point take hold.
Obama shows no signs of initiating or even endorsing that sort of effort even in the absence of the political and fiscal obstacles standing in the way but his rousing rhetoric still carries the day on the streets, just as it does in high-income “liberal” enclaves and an increasing number of congressional office suites. It’d be interesting to arrange a meet and greet between the candidate and those diverse constituencies.
The proprietor of BTC News at present numbers among the displaced; if you like the site and care to support it financially, this would be a fine time to do so.

How odd; it was Senator Obama’s speaking of homeless veterans, saying: ‘America We Can Do Better Than That’, which inspired my Homeless for Obama blog.
He recently passed legislation getting federal funding for veterans, specifically to provide more shelter and job retraining options for returning Iraqi war veterans. The last VA stat I read was 400 were homeless a year or so ago.
California supporters of Senator Obama, did indeed do a voter registration job among homeless. They are allowed to vote if they have a street address, which can be family or a service providers.
Here in Long Beach a local agency worker, has done voter registration drives here and when she did social service work in Orange County.
May 12th, 2008 at 2:37 pmHi, Mary. Are you the Mary LB from the Slate reader forums? I’m a bit pressed for time at the moment, but in brief my thoughts on the veterans situation are that 1) they’re a very small fraction of the homeless population, and 2) I sort of dislike the notion of classifying homeless people according to how deserving they are of help, which is what the focus on veterans does. Surely, veterans should be helped; so should everyone else. Anyway, thanks for stopping by, more later. Cheers, Weldon
May 12th, 2008 at 2:46 pmAdlai Stevenson is said to have famously remarked to an admirer who said, “surely every thinking voter will support you,” …”Madam, I need the rest!”
Sounds like Obama (who some say has the same problem) at least has a start in southern Caliornia.
I’d guess the downtrodden have got a better chance with Obama than with the alternatives.
May 12th, 2008 at 4:54 pmHis background in supporting activists (particularly religious based groups) who do play some role in this sort of movement, apropos JackD’s comment, does suggest that his presidency has a better shot at helping than the alternatives.
I also would be surprised if he doesn’t support something of the sort touched upon, if not the breadth needed. I doubt he would oppose it. Cf. The number of things, even if the numbers were there is Congress, the current guy would block with one vote.
May 13th, 2008 at 7:34 amI’d be very surprised if Obama supported anything like a comprehensive approach to the problem even absent the financial constraints he’ll face, since that would amount to socialism and if there’s one thing he’s not, it’s a socialist of any real scope. It’s easy enough to cherry-pick specific populations, such as veterans, but genuinely attacking the problem on a massive scale would mean throwing large amounts of money at people many Americans don’t regard as deserving much other than punishment, and there would inevitably be a fairly high failure rate. Never mind that it probably costs more to harass the homeless and clean up after them than it would to house and treat them: the morality play carries the day. It’ll be some while before politicians get the nerve to say that they’ll do this thing not because the beneficiaries deserve it, but because it’s the right thing to do.
Which is to say, I’m not going to hold my breath. Either Clinton or Obama would be better than McCain would be or Bush has been, but you know, so would a blind pig. Whoopee!
May 13th, 2008 at 9:32 am