<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NB to LA Times: a little legWORK goes a long way too</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.btcnews.com/btcnews/1715/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.btcnews.com/btcnews/1715</link>
	<description>BTC News: News, politics, opinion and satire</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 20:52:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: JackD</title>
		<link>http://www.btcnews.com/btcnews/1715/comment-page-1#comment-1102085</link>
		<dc:creator>JackD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2007 02:50:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.btcnews.com/btcnews/1715#comment-1102085</guid>
		<description>Chicago lost Second City status to LA?  Who knew?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chicago lost Second City status to LA?  Who knew?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zinya</title>
		<link>http://www.btcnews.com/btcnews/1715/comment-page-1#comment-1102062</link>
		<dc:creator>zinya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Aug 2007 23:38:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.btcnews.com/btcnews/1715#comment-1102062</guid>
		<description>Yeah.  An apt metaphor, I suppose, given how much sand there is here for her to tell us to go pound.

Grrr.  Yes, it is definitely declining.  Went over early on real big here when the big cheeses in Chicago declared that the LA Times was mis-geared as a national paper and that clearly what LA Times readers wanted was more glitz and Hollywood coverage and the kind of crap that led to introducing a new section called &quot;Image.&quot;   [I think -- not entirely implausibly -- that it&#039;s a Chicago revenge for losing Second City status to LA, thinking they can make the LAT knuckle under to the Trib.  Whadayathink, windy towner?]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah.  An apt metaphor, I suppose, given how much sand there is here for her to tell us to go pound.</p>
<p>Grrr.  Yes, it is definitely declining.  Went over early on real big here when the big cheeses in Chicago declared that the LA Times was mis-geared as a national paper and that clearly what LA Times readers wanted was more glitz and Hollywood coverage and the kind of crap that led to introducing a new section called &#8220;Image.&#8221;   [I think -- not entirely implausibly -- that it's a Chicago revenge for losing Second City status to LA, thinking they can make the LAT knuckle under to the Trib.  Whadayathink, windy towner?]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JackD</title>
		<link>http://www.btcnews.com/btcnews/1715/comment-page-1#comment-1102055</link>
		<dc:creator>JackD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Aug 2007 21:57:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.btcnews.com/btcnews/1715#comment-1102055</guid>
		<description>Looks like Feinstein is in a position to tell the critics to pound sand and, in effect, is doing so.  My brother, out in southern Cal, has maintained the decline of the LAT dates to its acquisition by the Tribune Company.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like Feinstein is in a position to tell the critics to pound sand and, in effect, is doing so.  My brother, out in southern Cal, has maintained the decline of the LAT dates to its acquisition by the Tribune Company.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

