Comments on: Bush On Immigration: Conditional Amnesty, But Amnesty Nonetheless

By: Weldon Berger

Weldon Berger — Wed, 17 May 2006 01:58:38 +0000

Hey, it’s not me, Joe: it’s those damned Bush-hating Republicans. I’m just pointing out that Democrats might be the less obstructionist party on this issue.

Dickerson, by the by, seems to have removed “Bush haters” from the column that pissed me off a week or so back.

By: Joe

Joe — Wed, 17 May 2006 00:26:11 +0000

Impeachment?! Playing into Sen. Dole’s hands again, Weldon? Shame!

By: Weldon Berger

Weldon Berger — Tue, 16 May 2006 19:14:33 +0000

Rebecca, I’m not opposed to conditional amnesty; I just thought it was funny that Bush went to such lengths to say that his amnesty program isn’t an amnesty program, and I wish we would do something about our public education system.

Publius, yes, that was the very model of trenchanticity.

By: PubliusToo

PubliusToo — Tue, 16 May 2006 18:36:19 +0000

Forget impeachment. I will agree to support ejecting the millions of illegal immigratns and a complete blockade at the Mexican-American Border on two conditions and two conditions only. First, those actions must be approved a voter referendum and each U.S. citizen must publicly declare his or her vote. Second, each U.S. citizen voting in favor of these actions must help pick up the slack by accepting the jobs currently held by the illegal immigrants for the wages currently paid to them.

Was that trenchant enough for you, Weldon?

By: Rebecca

Rebecca — Tue, 16 May 2006 12:46:22 +0000

I’m sorry all you amnesty opposers and Democrats, but I happen to be pro amnesty. It will relieve a lot of stressors for the immigrants, industries, and our economy. The ‘conditional’ part sounds thesible without actually rewarding all of the indocumented who are doing wrong in other manners. PRO AMNESTY!
SI SE PUEDE!