<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: On Mearsheimer and Walt: a response to Juan Cole</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.btcnews.com/btcnews/1313/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.btcnews.com/btcnews/1313</link>
	<description>BTC News: News, politics, opinion and satire</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 16:09:48 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://www.btcnews.com/btcnews/1313/comment-page-1#comment-23530</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 May 2006 03:35:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.btcnews.com/btcnews/?p=1313#comment-23530</guid>
		<description>I read Cole&#039;s defense against attacks but not the original and he too seemed to think they played their hand somewhat too strongly. 

A complex view seems appropriate, and I do think that it is logical for us -- to a point of course -- to support Israel. This does makes it a bit difficult to separate the wheat from the chaff, so to speak, and sometimes people look at the bad steps as some sort of unfair conspiracy or something. But, sometimes it is a bad step, helped by a lobby that does have a special relationship.

Again, rightly so, but as you say the rub is what to do with it. As with everything else about this administration for instance, their actions are counterproductive too often, even if their basic ends are right (not quite the case often enough).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read Cole&#8217;s defense against attacks but not the original and he too seemed to think they played their hand somewhat too strongly. </p>
<p>A complex view seems appropriate, and I do think that it is logical for us &#8212; to a point of course &#8212; to support Israel. This does makes it a bit difficult to separate the wheat from the chaff, so to speak, and sometimes people look at the bad steps as some sort of unfair conspiracy or something. But, sometimes it is a bad step, helped by a lobby that does have a special relationship.</p>
<p>Again, rightly so, but as you say the rub is what to do with it. As with everything else about this administration for instance, their actions are counterproductive too often, even if their basic ends are right (not quite the case often enough).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LanceThruster</title>
		<link>http://www.btcnews.com/btcnews/1313/comment-page-1#comment-23341</link>
		<dc:creator>LanceThruster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 May 2006 17:40:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.btcnews.com/btcnews/?p=1313#comment-23341</guid>
		<description>I think one of the greatest outrages of the Israel Lobby is the way they squelch discussion and dissent. Anyone even questioning policy is quickly smeared and dismissed as anti-Semitic. Politicians, who are not on the whole known for principled stands, succumb to the path of least resistance and wind up doing the bidding of the lobby regardless of their own views on the matter. And, as I think can be seen, the effect is cumulative. Read how Alan Dershowitz attacks Walt and Mearsheimer and then cries over how scurrilous their assertions are. Maybe they&#039;re right, maybe they&#039;re not....but I certainly don&#039;t view them as bigots but rather academics courageous enough to begin a dialogue on this issue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think one of the greatest outrages of the Israel Lobby is the way they squelch discussion and dissent. Anyone even questioning policy is quickly smeared and dismissed as anti-Semitic. Politicians, who are not on the whole known for principled stands, succumb to the path of least resistance and wind up doing the bidding of the lobby regardless of their own views on the matter. And, as I think can be seen, the effect is cumulative. Read how Alan Dershowitz attacks Walt and Mearsheimer and then cries over how scurrilous their assertions are. Maybe they&#8217;re right, maybe they&#8217;re not&#8230;.but I certainly don&#8217;t view them as bigots but rather academics courageous enough to begin a dialogue on this issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
