Comments on: Scottie in the Duck Pit

By: Jorg Gebhasdt

Jorg Gebhasdt — Wed, 30 Nov 2005 10:05:21 +0000

LOOK AT THIS LINK

Scottie in the Duck Pit

By: billyboy42

billyboy42 — Wed, 02 Nov 2005 19:50:35 +0000

A good question for Scotty would be:
‘Is the administartion going to appoint any aides which are NOT a member of the Project for a New American Century, which urged Clinton for war with Iraq in 1997 and for whom Lewis Libby wrote some of its ‘white papers’, including Rebuilding America’s Defenses ?

By: Randy

Randy — Wed, 02 Nov 2005 09:09:28 +0000

Hmmm… So now it’s not good ol’ “Scooter.” It’s not “Mr. Libby.” No. It’s like they no longer know the man and are forbidden from uttering his name anymore. Interesting…

From Scotty’s quote above:

“…In terms of the individual you bring up, there is a presumption of innocence…”

Too funny. Just wait til Fitzgerald comes in for the next round. I wonder if they’ll conveniently forget Rove’s and Cheney’s names, too?

By: LarryO

LarryO — Tue, 01 Nov 2005 04:59:46 +0000

I am certain that the explanation will be that Bush was acting officially as President, whereas Libby was lying through his teeth in his personal, as opposed to his official, capacity.

That is, cooperation was required by prevailing policy; the lying was just . . . what was happening.