<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Duality of Al Franken</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.btcnews.com/btcnews/1035/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.btcnews.com/btcnews/1035</link>
	<description>BTC News: News, politics, opinion and satire</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 20:52:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ghassan</title>
		<link>http://www.btcnews.com/btcnews/1035/comment-page-1#comment-12306</link>
		<dc:creator>Ghassan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Dec 2005 14:51:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.btcnews.com/btcnews/?p=1035#comment-12306</guid>
		<description>You are right. There was a poll, and I referred to its refutation, which Franken could have found easily using his much touted Lexis Nexis access. His omission of the poll&#039;s refutation is consistent with how he supports his views on the subject of Arabs and their opinions of Israel and the United States. Not that a more objective poll than the one referenced couldn&#039;t have concluded similar results, there isn&#039;t a reliable poll on the subject; therefore, Franken commits himself to parroting lies qualitatively similar to the ones he accused others of committing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are right. There was a poll, and I referred to its refutation, which Franken could have found easily using his much touted Lexis Nexis access. His omission of the poll&#8217;s refutation is consistent with how he supports his views on the subject of Arabs and their opinions of Israel and the United States. Not that a more objective poll than the one referenced couldn&#8217;t have concluded similar results, there isn&#8217;t a reliable poll on the subject; therefore, Franken commits himself to parroting lies qualitatively similar to the ones he accused others of committing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: starwheel</title>
		<link>http://www.btcnews.com/btcnews/1035/comment-page-1#comment-11717</link>
		<dc:creator>starwheel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2005 13:34:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.btcnews.com/btcnews/?p=1035#comment-11717</guid>
		<description>Wait a second, was there or was there not a Gallup Poll of Islamic countries after 9/11?

Answer: YES

If there was, what were the results?

&quot;Many in Islamic world doubt Arabs behind 9/11&quot;
http://www.usatoday.com/news/sept11/2002/02/27/usat-poll.htm

Where is Al Franken&#039;s lie here?

Al Franken didn&#039;t lie. He even had a source for the paragraph.

You are free to disagree with the results of the poll; however, Franken didn&#039;t publish the results. USA Today did.

If the results weren&#039;t valid, then USA Today lied.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wait a second, was there or was there not a Gallup Poll of Islamic countries after 9/11?</p>
<p>Answer: YES</p>
<p>If there was, what were the results?</p>
<p>&#8220;Many in Islamic world doubt Arabs behind 9/11&#8243;<br />
<a href="http://www.usatoday.com/news/sept11/2002/02/27/usat-poll.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.usatoday.com/news/sept11/2002/02/27/usat-poll.htm</a></p>
<p>Where is Al Franken&#8217;s lie here?</p>
<p>Al Franken didn&#8217;t lie. He even had a source for the paragraph.</p>
<p>You are free to disagree with the results of the poll; however, Franken didn&#8217;t publish the results. USA Today did.</p>
<p>If the results weren&#8217;t valid, then USA Today lied.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

